Defect Prediction Models: Industry Adoption Best Practices and Case Studies
Keywords:
Defect prediction, software quality, case studies, industry adoption, best practicesAbstract
The article discusses the industry adoption and best practices in defect prediction models, emphasizing their integration, collaboration, explain ability, continuous improvement, and alignment with organizational goals. It outlines key practices such as integration into development workflows, collaboration between data scientists and developers, explain ability for developer understanding, continuous model evaluation, addressing imbalanced datasets, context-aware model configuration, training on representative data, feedback loops for continuous improvement, rigorous model evaluation metrics, and alignment with organizational goals. These metrics provide quantitative insights into code quality and defect proneness. Defective software modules cause software failures, increase development and maintenance costs, and decrease customer satisfaction. These practices collectively enable organizations to proactively manage software quality, improve development workflows, and deliver reliable software solutions.
In addition, the case studies presented showcase the real-world application and impact of defect prediction models in diverse industries. Numerous software quality models have been proposed and developed to assess and improve the quality of software products.The cases include a large-scale e-commerce platform achieving a 20% reduction in post-release defects, a software development consultancy improving resource allocation efficiency by 15%, an open-source software community experiencing a 30% reduction in the time taken to address defects, and a financial services organization achieving a 25% reduction in security-related defects. Lessons learned from these case studies highlight the importance of tailoring to context, continuous feedback loops, integration into workflows, metric selection, transparency, and collaboration in maximizing the effectiveness of defect prediction models across various development contexts.
Readership Data
Refreshing Cached Analytics Data
The cached analytics data has become stale and www.thesciencebrigade.com is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.
Downloads
References
A. G. Koru and H. Liu, "Building effective defect-prediction models in practice," in IEEE Software, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 23-29, Nov.-Dec. 2005, doi: 10.1109/MS.2005.149. quality; software metrics.
Pargaonkar, S. (2020). A Review of Software Quality Models: A Comprehensive Analysis. Journal of Science & Technology, 1(1), 40–53. Retrieved from https://thesciencebrigade.com/jst/article/view/37
C. Tantithamthavorn, S. McIntosh, A. E. Hassan and K. Matsumoto, "The Impact of Automated Parameter Optimization on Defect Prediction Models," in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 683-711, 1 July 2019, doi: 10.1109/TSE.2018.2794977.
Pargaonkar, S. “Achieving Optimal Efficiency: A Meta-Analytical Exploration of Lean Manufacturing Principles”. Journal of Science & Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, Oct. 2020, pp. 54-60, https://thesciencebrigade.com/jst/article/view/38
Pargaonkar, S. “Bridging the Gap: Methodological Insights from Cognitive Science for Enhanced Requirement Gathering”. Journal of Science & Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, Oct. 2020, pp. 61-66, https://thesciencebrigade.com/jst/article/view/39
Ghotra, B., McIntosh, S., & Hassan, A. E. (2015, May). Revisiting the impact of classification techniques on the performance of defect prediction models. In 2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (Vol. 1, pp. 789-800). IEEE.
Yennapusa, H., & Palle, R. R. Scholars Journal of Engineering and Technology (SJET) ISSN 2347-9523 (Print).
Pargaonkar, S. “Future Directions and Concluding Remarks Navigating the Horizon of Software Quality Engineering”. Journal of Science & Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, Oct. 2020, pp. 67-81, https://thesciencebrigade.com/jst/article/view/40
S. Pal and A. Sillitti, "A Classification of Software Defect Prediction Models," 2021 International Conference "Nonlinearity, Information and Robotics" (NIR), Innopolis, Russian Federation, 2021, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/NIR52917.2021.9666110.
Pargaonkar, S. “Quality and Metrics in Software Quality Engineering”. Journal of Science & Technology, vol. 2, no. 1, Mar. 2021, pp. 62-69, https://thesciencebrigade.com/jst/article/view/41
Pargaonkar, S. “The Crucial Role of Inspection in Software Quality Assurance”. Journal of Science & Technology, vol. 2, no. 1, Mar. 2021, pp. 70-77, https://thesciencebrigade.com/jst/article/view/42
Pargaonkar, S. “Unveiling the Future: Cybernetic Dynamics in Quality Assurance and Testing for Software Development”. Journal of Science & Technology, vol. 2, no. 1, Mar. 2021, pp. 78-84, https://thesciencebrigade.com/jst/article/view/43
Pargaonkar, S. “Unveiling the Challenges, A Comprehensive Review of Common Hurdles in Maintaining Software Quality”. Journal of Science & Technology, vol. 2, no. 1, Mar. 2021, pp. 85-94, https://thesciencebrigade.com/jst/article/view/44
Yennapusa, Haritha, and Ranadeep Reddy Palle. "Scholars Journal of Engineering and Technology (SJET) ISSN 2347-9523 (Print)."
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Dr. Allison Reed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License Terms
Ownership and Licensing:
Authors of this research paper submitted to the journal owned and operated by The Science Brigade Group retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal certain rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and have granted the journal a right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agreed to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License.
License Permissions:
Under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, as long as proper attribution is given to the authors and acknowledgement is made of the initial publication in the Journal. This license allows for the broad dissemination and utilization of research papers.
Additional Distribution Arrangements:
Authors are free to enter into separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work. This may include posting the work to institutional repositories, publishing it in journals or books, or other forms of dissemination. In such cases, authors are requested to acknowledge the initial publication of the work in this Journal.
Online Posting:
Authors are encouraged to share their work online, including in institutional repositories, disciplinary repositories, or on their personal websites. This permission applies both prior to and during the submission process to the Journal. Online sharing enhances the visibility and accessibility of the research papers.
Responsibility and Liability:
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their research papers do not infringe upon the copyright, privacy, or other rights of any third party. The Science Brigade Publishers disclaim any liability or responsibility for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights in the research papers.
