AI-Enabled Predictive Maintenance Strategies for Extending the Lifespan of Legacy Systems

Authors

  • Brij Kishore Pandey Independent Researcher, Boonton, NJ, USA Author
  • Subba Rao Katragadda Independent Researcher, Tracy, CA, USA Author
  • Ajay Tanikonda Independent Researcher, San Ramon, CA, USA Author
  • Sudhakar Reddy Peddinti Independent Researcher, San Jose, CA, USA Author

Keywords:

Predictive maintenance, artificial intelligence

Abstract

Legacy systems form the backbone of many industries, yet they often face critical challenges in operational efficiency, reliability, and scalability due to technological obsolescence. These systems, constrained by outdated hardware and software, require innovative strategies to sustain their operational viability and extend their lifespan. This paper investigates the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in predictive maintenance (PdM) as a transformative approach to address these challenges. By leveraging advanced AI models, including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques, predictive maintenance facilitates real-time monitoring, fault prediction, and informed decision-making. These capabilities ensure reduced downtime, enhanced risk mitigation, and optimized asset lifecycle management.

The study begins by delineating the complexities inherent in legacy systems, particularly their limited integration with modern data-driven technologies, and explores how AI technologies can bridge these gaps. AI-enabled predictive maintenance strategies are framed within the broader context of Industry 4.0, emphasizing their alignment with digital transformation initiatives. Detailed discussions are presented on key methodologies such as anomaly detection, predictive analytics, and root cause analysis, with particular focus on their adaptability to the unique constraints of legacy systems. For instance, supervised and unsupervised learning algorithms, combined with time-series analysis, have demonstrated significant potential in predicting failures and mitigating risks, despite the limited data availability and heterogeneous configurations typical of legacy infrastructure.

A central theme of the paper is the role of hybrid AI models that combine statistical and neural approaches to overcome the limitations posed by noisy, sparse, or incomplete data. Case studies of real-world implementations are reviewed, illustrating how predictive maintenance has successfully enhanced operational efficiency in various industries, including manufacturing, energy, and transportation. For example, neural networks, such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models, are highlighted for their efficacy in temporal data prediction, enabling proactive measures to avert system failures. Additionally, Bayesian methods and reinforcement learning frameworks are evaluated for their application in decision-making processes under uncertainty, particularly in dynamic operational environments.

To address the scalability and deployment challenges associated with legacy systems, this study evaluates edge computing and federated learning paradigms. These technologies enable decentralized AI processing, minimizing latency and ensuring data privacy, which are critical in sectors with stringent regulatory requirements. Furthermore, the integration of digital twin technologies into predictive maintenance workflows is explored as a means of creating virtual representations of legacy systems, facilitating real-time simulation and performance optimization.

The study also delves into the economic and operational implications of adopting AI-driven predictive maintenance. Metrics such as mean time to repair (MTTR), mean time between failures (MTBF), and return on investment (ROI) are examined to quantify the benefits of these strategies. Challenges such as resistance to technological change, initial implementation costs, and the need for cross-disciplinary expertise are critically analyzed. Strategies for addressing these barriers, including phased adoption models, stakeholder education, and robust cybersecurity frameworks, are proposed.

Readership Data

🌐

Refreshing Cached Analytics Data

The cached analytics data has become stale and www.thesciencebrigade.com is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Çınar, Z. M., Abdussalam Nuhu, A., Zeeshan, Q., Korhan, O., Asmael, M., & Safaei, B. (2020). Machine learning in predictive maintenance towards sustainable smart manufacturing in industry 4.0. Sustainability, 12(19), 8211.

Zheng, H., Paiva, A. R., & Gurciullo, C. S. (2020). Advancing from predictive maintenance to intelligent maintenance with ai and iiot. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.00351.

Ran, Y., Zhou, X., Lin, P., Wen, Y., & Deng, R. (2019). A survey of predictive maintenance: Systems, purposes and approaches. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.07383, 1-36.

S. Matzka, "Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Predictive Maintenance Applications," 2020 Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Industries (AI4I), Irvine, CA, USA, 2020, pp. 69-74, doi: 10.1109/AI4I49448.2020.00023. keywords: {Industries;Artificial intelligence;Predictive maintenance;explainable artificial intelligence;predictive maintenance;dataset;decision tree;model agnostic method},

Lee, S. M., Lee, D., & Kim, Y. S. (2019). The quality management ecosystem for predictive maintenance in the Industry 4.0 era. International Journal of Quality Innovation, 5(1), 4.

Ran, Yongyi, et al. "A survey of predictive maintenance: Systems, purposes and approaches." arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.07383 (2019): 1-36.

Susto, Gian Antonio, et al. "Machine learning for predictive maintenance: A multiple classifier approach." IEEE transactions on industrial informatics 11.3 (2014): 812-820.

Mobley, R. K. "An Introduction to Predictive Maintenance." Elsevier Science google schola 2 (2002): 485-520.

Valdez‐Flores, Ciriaco, and Richard M. Feldman. "A survey of preventive maintenance models for stochastically deteriorating single‐unit systems." Naval Research Logistics (NRL) 36.4 (1989): 419-446.

Vipin Saini, Sai Ganesh Reddy, Dheeraj Kumar, and Tanzeem Ahmad, “Evaluating FHIR’s impact on Health Data Interoperability ”, IoT and Edge Comp. J, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 28–63, Mar. 2021.

Maksim Muravev, Artiom Kuciuk, V. Maksimov, Tanzeem Ahmad, and Ajay Aakula, “Blockchain’s Role in Enhancing Transparency and Security in Digital Transformation”, J. Sci. Tech., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 865–904, Oct. 2020.

Barlow, Richard, and Larry Hunter. "Optimum preventive maintenance policies." Operations research 8.1 (1960): 90-100.

Wang, Hongzhou. "A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems." European journal of operational research 139.3 (2002): 469-489.

Carvalho, Thyago P., et al. "A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance." Computers & Industrial Engineering 137 (2019): 106024.

Siegel, Eric. Predictive analytics: The power to predict who will click, buy, lie, or die. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.

Dui, Hongyan, Shubin Si, and Richard CM Yam. "A cost-based integrated importance measure of system components for preventive maintenance." Reliability Engineering & System Safety 168 (2017): 98-104.

Bevilacqua, Maurizio, and Marcello Braglia. "The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection." Reliability Engineering & System Safety 70.1 (2000): 71-83.

Downloads

Published

04-12-2021

How to Cite

“AI-Enabled Predictive Maintenance Strategies for Extending the Lifespan of Legacy Systems”. Journal of Science & Technology, vol. 2, no. 5, Dec. 2021, pp. 105-27, https://www.thesciencebrigade.com/jst/article/view/510.

Plaudit