Bridging the Gap: Methodological Insights From Cognitive Science for Enhanced Requirement Gathering
Keywords:
Requirement gathering, Cognitive Science, Stakeholder engagementAbstract
This review paper critically examines methodological insights derived from cognitive science to refine and optimize the process of requirement gathering in various domains. With a focus on the intersection between cognitive science principles and requirement engineering, this paper aims to unravel strategies that enhance accuracy, comprehension, and communication throughout the requirement gathering phase. By synthesizing findings from diverse studies, this review contributes to a deeper understanding of how cognitive science methodologies can be strategically applied to improve the efficacy of requirement gathering processes. he successful bridging of the gap between learning spaces could further benefit from including more online social learning activities into the designed learning process and from involving teachers as cocreators of the learning process and resources.
Readership Data
Refreshing Cached Analytics Data
The cached analytics data has become stale and www.thesciencebrigade.com is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.
Downloads
References
• Jagušt, T., Botički, I., & So, H. J. (2018). A review of research on bridging the gap between formal and informal learning with technology in primary school contexts. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(4), 417-428.
• Loynton, S. (2015). The Project Community Framework: Towards Bridging the Gap between User Centred Design and Academic Scientific Software Development.
• Pargaonkar, S. S., Patil, V. V., Deshpande, P. A., & Prabhune, M. S. (2015). DESIGN OF VERTICAL GRAVITY DIE CASTING MACHINE. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR SCIENTFIC RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 3(3), 14–15.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License Terms
Ownership and Licensing:
Authors of this research paper submitted to the journal owned and operated by The Science Brigade Group retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal certain rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and have granted the journal a right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agreed to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License.
License Permissions:
Under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, as long as proper attribution is given to the authors and acknowledgement is made of the initial publication in the Journal. This license allows for the broad dissemination and utilization of research papers.
Additional Distribution Arrangements:
Authors are free to enter into separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work. This may include posting the work to institutional repositories, publishing it in journals or books, or other forms of dissemination. In such cases, authors are requested to acknowledge the initial publication of the work in this Journal.
Online Posting:
Authors are encouraged to share their work online, including in institutional repositories, disciplinary repositories, or on their personal websites. This permission applies both prior to and during the submission process to the Journal. Online sharing enhances the visibility and accessibility of the research papers.
Responsibility and Liability:
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their research papers do not infringe upon the copyright, privacy, or other rights of any third party. The Science Brigade Publishers disclaim any liability or responsibility for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights in the research papers.
